The Net Neutrality rules aimed to protect open, free, and fast Internet for all, while opponents questioned federal agency authority and worried ...
The U.S. Supreme Court closed out 2024 by confirming states’ authority to regulate internet service providers. On December 16, 2024, the Court ...
Online service providers in the U.S. are generally protected from intermediary liability under Section 230 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 as updated, as long as they take “reasonable ...
Engadget on MSN16d
US Court of Appeals rules against effort to restore net neutralityThe Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC doesn't have the authority to implement net neutrality rules.
A federal appeals court on Thursday dealt a blow to President Biden’s Federal Communications Commission ... in the landmark Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Under the Communications Act of 1934, such public utility services are subject to government regulation. In doing so, the FCC aimed to make ISPs accountable for outages, require more robust ...
A federal appeals court on Thursday dealt a blow to President Biden’s Federal Communications Commission ... in the landmark Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
The classification subjects such services to government oversight under the Communications Act of 1934. Through this action, the FCC sought to hold ISPs accountable for service disruptions ...
“The FCC’s reading is inconsistent with the plain language of the Communications Act [of 1934],” the court in Cincinnati said, referring to the law outlining the FCC’s authority. A ...
Hosted on MSN16d
Court Ruling Kills Net-Neutrality Rules That Were Already Doomedhinges on two categories of service in the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, “information services” as defined in Title I of that statue and “telecommunications services” as defined ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback